Advanced sulfur control concepts in hot-gas desulfurization technology. Quarterly report, April 1--June 30, 1997 [electronic resource].

Published:: Washington, D.C. : United States. Dept. of Energy, 1997.
Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy.
Physical Description:: 43 pages : digital, PDF file
Additional Creators:: United States. Department of Energy and United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information

Access Online

www.osti.gov

Availability

Finding items...

Restrictions on Access:

Free-to-read Unrestricted online access

Summary:

Three areas of research were pursued during the past quarter. Experimental CeO₂ sulfidation and regeneration tests examined the effect of SO₂ concentration and gas flow rate on the production of elemental sulfur during regeneration. The maximum number of cycles using a single sorbent charge was increased to 13, and initial tests using a second source of CeO₂ (from Molycorp, Inc.) were carried out. In the process analysis effort, a third case study based on single-stage desulfurization using CeO₂ sorbent was added. Capital and operating costs for this option were estimated under base case conditions. The sensitivity of the annual levelized cost of all three cases to variations in sorbent durability, sorbent unit cost, O₂ and N₂ unit cost, and capital cost was examined. As the sorbent cost was reduced, based on smaller sorbent replacement rate and/or smaller sorbent unit cost, the annual levelized cost of all three processes decreased, and the cerium process became more attractive. For example, at a sorbent replacement rate of 0.1% of the sorbent circulation rate, both cerium processes should be less costly than the single-stage zinc sorbent process. As the sorbent replacement rate approaches zero (infinite sorbent lifetime), income from the sulfur by-product and export steam produced by the cerium processes exceeds the other process costs and a profit of $2 to 2.5 million appears possible. In contrast, the annual levelized cost of the zinc-based process at zero sorbent replacement rate is about $5 million.

Report Numbers:

E 1.99:doe/mc/30012--t1
doe/mc/30012--t1

Subject(s):

Coal, Lignite, And Peat

Other Subject(s):

Note:

Published through SciTech Connect.
12/31/1997.
"doe/mc/30012--t1"
"DE98054496"
Harrison, D.P.
Louisiana State Univ., Dept. of Chemical Engineering, Baton Rouge, LA (United States)

Funding Information:

AC21-94MC30012

View MARC record | catkey: 13835205