Actions for Preliminary analysis of treatment strategies for transuranic wastes from reprocessing plants [electronic resource].
Preliminary analysis of treatment strategies for transuranic wastes from reprocessing plants [electronic resource].
- Published
- Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy, 1985.
- Additional Creators
- United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information
Access Online
- Restrictions on Access
- Free-to-read Unrestricted online access
- Summary
- This document provides a comparison of six treatment options for transuranic wastes (TRUW) resulting from the reprocessing of commercial spent fuel. Projected transuranic waste streams from the Barnwell Nuclear Fuel Plant (BNFP), the reference fuel reprocessing plant in this report, were grouped into the five categories of hulls and hardware, failed equipment, filters, fluorinator solids, and general process trash (GPT) and sample and analytical cell (SAC) wastes. Six potential treatment options were selected for the five categories of waste. These options represent six basic treatment objectives: (1) no treatment, (2) minimum treatment (compaction), (3) minimum number of processes and products (cementing or grouting), (4) maximum volume reduction without decontamination (melting, incinerating, hot pressing), (5) maximum volume reduction with decontamination (decontamination, treatment of residues), and (6) noncombustible waste forms (melting, incinerating, cementing). Schemes for treatment of each waste type were selected and developed for each treatment option and each type of waste. From these schemes, transuranic waste volumes were found to vary from 1 m/sup 3//MTU for no treatment to as low as 0.02 m/sup 3//MTU. Based on conceptual design requirements, life-cycle costs were estimated for treatment plus on-site storage, transportation, and disposal of both high-level and transuranic wastes (and incremental low-level wastes) from 70,000 MTU. The study concludes that extensive treatment is warranted from both cost and waste form characteristics considerations, and that the characteristics of most of the processing systems used are acceptable. The study recommends that additional combinations of treatment methods or strategies be evaluated and that in the interim, melting, incineration, and cementing be further developed for commercial TRUW. 45 refs., 9 figs., 32 tabs.
- Report Numbers
- E 1.99:pnl-5130
pnl-5130 - Subject(s)
- Other Subject(s)
- Alpha-Bearing Wastes
- Cementing
- Combustion
- Compacting
- Grouting
- Hot Pressing
- Melting
- Radioactive Waste Processing
- Barnwell Fuel Processing Plant
- Cost Benefit Analysis
- Decontamination
- Operating Cost
- Recommendations
- Volume
- Waste Transportation
- Chemical Reactions
- Cleaning
- Cost
- Fabrication
- Fuel Reprocessing Plants
- Management
- Materials
- Materials Working
- Nuclear Facilities
- Oxidation
- Phase Transformations
- Pressing
- Processing
- Radioactive Materials
- Radioactive Wastes
- Thermochemical Processes
- Transport
- Waste Management
- Waste Processing
- Wastes
- Note
- Published through SciTech Connect.
07/01/1985.
"pnl-5130"
"DE85017692"
Schneider, K.J.; Swanson, J.L.; Allen, R.P.; Ross, W.A.; Yasutake, K.M.
Pacific Northwest Labs., Richland, WA (USA) - Funding Information
- AC06-76RL01830
View MARC record | catkey: 14419460