A Modular Framework for Modeling Hardware Elements in Distributed Engine Control Systems

Author: Zinnecker, Alicia M.
Published: January 2015.
Physical Description: 1 electronic document
Additional Creators: Culley, Dennis E. and Aretskin-Hariton, Eliot D.

Online Version

hdl.handle.net , Connect to this object online.

Availability

Finding items...

Restrictions on Access

Unclassified, Unlimited, Publicly available.
Free-to-read Unrestricted online access

Summary

Progress toward the implementation of distributed engine control in an aerospace application may be accelerated through the development of a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) system for testing new control architectures and hardware outside of a physical test cell environment. One component required in an HIL simulation system is a high-fidelity model of the control platform: sensors, actuators, and the control law. The control system developed for the Commercial Modular Aero-Propulsion System Simulation 40k (C-MAPSS40k) provides a verifiable baseline for development of a model for simulating a distributed control architecture. This distributed controller model will contain enhanced hardware models, capturing the dynamics of the transducer and the effects of data processing, and a model of the controller network. A multilevel framework is presented that establishes three sets of interfaces in the control platform: communication with the engine (through sensors and actuators), communication between hardware and controller (over a network), and the physical connections within individual pieces of hardware. This introduces modularity at each level of the model, encouraging collaboration in the development and testing of various control schemes or hardware designs. At the hardware level, this modularity is leveraged through the creation of a SimulinkR library containing blocks for constructing smart transducer models complying with the IEEE 1451 specification. These hardware models were incorporated in a distributed version of the baseline C-MAPSS40k controller and simulations were run to compare the performance of the two models. The overall tracking ability differed only due to quantization effects in the feedback measurements in the distributed controller. Additionally, it was also found that the added complexity of the smart transducer models did not prevent real-time operation of the distributed controller model, a requirement of an HIL system.

Other Subject(s)

Collection

NASA Technical Reports Server (NTRS) Collection.

Note

Document ID: 20150000737.
AIAA Paper 2014-3530.
GRC-E-DAA-TN17332.
E-19011.
NASA/TM-2015-218451.
Joint Propulsion Conference; 28-30 Jul. 2014; Cleveland, OH; United States.

Terms of Use and Reproduction

View MARC record | catkey: 15416913