Automobile accident compensation. Volume III, Payments from all sources [electronic resource] / Robert L. Houchens
- Houchens, Robert L., 1952-
- Santa Monica, CA : RAND, 1985.
- Physical Description:
- xi, 63 p. : ill. ; 28 cm.
- Additional Creators:
- Rand Corporation and Institute for Civil Justice (U.S.)
- Restrictions on Access:
- License restrictions may limit access.
- This report compares outcomes of compensation systems for victims of automobile accidents from three groups of states: (1) no-fault states, with no-fault legislation that restricts tort liability; (2) add-on states, in which no-fault legislation does not restrict tort liability; and (3) tort states, without no-fault legislation. Among the study's conclusions were the following: (1) the probability of an auto accident victim's receiving any payment for his losses is higher in add-on and no-fault states than in tort states; (2) the average payment to the victim is usually nearer his economic loss in no-fault states than it is in tort states and add-on states for small losses; (3) the employer is the single most frequent source for payment of wage loss, and pays exactly the amount of wage loss about eighty percent of the time; and (4) victims in no-fault states appear to have a better chance of getting some compensation for wage loss than do victims in tort states.
- Insurance, Automobile—Law and legislation—United States—States
- Insurance, No-fault automobile—Law and legislation—United States—States
- Liability for traffic accidents—United States—States
- Arbitration and award—United States—States
- Automobile insurance claims—United States—States
- Accident law—United States—States
- "The Institute for Civil Justice."
- Bibliography Note:
- Includes bibliographical references (p. 63).
View MARC record | catkey: 17044892