Actions for Uncertainty quantification for nuclear density functional theory and information content of new measurements [electronic resource].

Email RIS file
Bookmark
Report an Issue

Uncertainty quantification for nuclear density functional theory and information content of new measurements [electronic resource].

Published
Washington, D.C. : United States. National Nuclear Security Administration, 2015.
Oak Ridge, Tenn. : Distributed by the Office of Scientific and Technical Information, U.S. Dept. of Energy
Physical Description
Article numbers 122,501 : digital, PDF file
Additional Creators
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States. National Nuclear Security Administration, and United States. Department of Energy. Office of Scientific and Technical Information
Access Online

Availability

I Want It
I Want It

Finding items...

Restrictions on Access
Free-to-read Unrestricted online access
Summary
Statistical tools of uncertainty quantification can be used to assess the information content of measured observables with respect to present-day theoretical models, to estimate model errors and thereby improve predictive capability, to extrapolate beyond the regions reached by experiment, and to provide meaningful input to applications and planned measurements. To showcase new opportunities offered by such tools, we make a rigorous analysis of theoretical statistical uncertainties in nuclear density functional theory using Bayesian inference methods. By considering the recent mass measurements from the Canadian Penning Trap at Argonne National Laboratory, we demonstrate how the Bayesian analysis and a direct least-squares optimization, combined with high-performance computing, can be used to assess the information content of the new data with respect to a model based on the Skyrme energy density functional approach. Employing the posterior probability distribution computed with a Gaussian process emulator, we apply the Bayesian framework to propagate theoretical statistical uncertainties in predictions of nuclear masses, two-neutron dripline, and fission barriers. Overall, we find that the new mass measurements do not impose a constraint that is strong enough to lead to significant changes in the model parameters. Furthermore, the example discussed in this study sets the stage for quantifying and maximizing the impact of new measurements with respect to current modeling and guiding future experimental efforts, thus enhancing the experiment-theory cycle in the scientific method.
Report Numbers
E 1.99:1337830
Subject(s)
Note
Published through SciTech Connect.
03/24/2015.
Physical Review Letters 114 12 ISSN 0031-9007; PRLTAO AM
J. D. McDonnell; N. Schunck; D. Higdon; J. Sarich; S. M. Wild; W. Nazarewicz.
Funding Information
AC05-00OR22725
View MARC record | catkey: 23503975