Actions for Choosing for changing selves
Choosing for changing selves / Richard Pettigrew
- Author
- Pettigrew, Richard
- Published
- Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2020.
- Edition
- First edition.
- Physical Description
- 1 online resource : illustrations (black and white).
Access Online
- Oxford scholarship online: ezaccess.libraries.psu.edu
- Series
- Contents
- Machine generated contents note: pt. I AGGREGATING SELVES -- 1.The problem of choosing for changing selves -- 2.The economists' orthodoxy: expected utility theory -- 2.1.Expected utility theory: an example -- 2.2.Expected utility theory: the general case -- 2.3.Interpreting expected utility theory -- 2.4.Alternative decision theories -- 2.5.Expected utility theory and the problem of choosing for changing selves -- 3.Existing solutions I: the Unchanging Utility Solution -- 4.Existing solutions II: the Utility of Utility Solution -- 5.Existing solutions III: the One True Utility Solution -- 5.1.The Reflection Principle -- 5.2.The Weak Reflection Principle -- 5.3.Permissivism and learning from others -- 5.4.The objectivist's version of our problem -- 5.5.The implausible strength of objectivism -- 5.6.Appendix: Proof of Theorem 5.1.1 -- 6.The Aggregate Utility Solution I: which attitudes to aggregate? -- 6.1.Aggregating preferences -- 6.2.Aggregating evaluation functions -- 6.3.Aggregating credences and utilities -- 7.The Aggregate Utility Solution II: the solution itself -- 7.1.The framework -- 7.2.The decision rule -- 7.3.The instability of preferences -- 7.4.Responding to instability -- 8.Can we compare the utilities of different selves? -- 8.1.Representing values with numbers -- 8.2.Empathetic preferences -- 8.3.The Zero-One Rule -- 8.4.The Fixed Points Solution -- 8.5.The Fixed Interval Solution -- 8.6.The Matching Intervals Solution -- 9.Why aggregate using weighted averages? -- 9.1.The argument for linear pooling -- 9.1.1.The Principle of Minimal Mutilation -- 9.1.2.The dominance argument for weighted averages -- 9.2.The features of linear pooling -- 9.2.1.Arrow's conditions -- 9.2.2.Aggregating credences I: Independence Preservation -- 9.2.3.Aggregating credences II: commuting with conditionalization -- 9.2.4.Aggregating credences III: Independence Preservation revisited -- 9.3.Appendix: Proofs of Theorems 9.2.1 and 9.2.3 -- 9.3.1.Proof of Theorem 9.2.3 -- 10.Do we know enough to make decisions this way? -- 10.1.The deliberative conception of decision theory -- 10.2.Paul's Utility Ignorance Objection -- 10.3.Paul's Revelation Response -- 10.4.The Fine-Graining Response -- 10.5.Paul's Authenticity Reply -- 10.6.Moss's No Knowledge Reply -- 10.7.Assessing Moss's No Knowledge Reply: the Paulian view -- 10.8.Assessing Moss's No Knowledge Reply: the independent view -- pt. II SETTING THE WEIGHTS -- 11.The problem of weighting changing selves -- 12.The weight of the past -- 12.1.Deathbed decisions -- 12.2.Past values and permissibility -- 12.3.Past values and obligations -- 12.3.1.Three related principles -- 12.3.2.The libertarian objection -- 12.3.3.Exchange rates -- 12.3.4.Moral blackmail -- 12.3.5.Applying the Beneficiary Principle -- 12.3.6.Obligations and reparations -- 12.3.7.The intrapersonal version of the Beneficiary Principle -- 13.Discounting the future -- 13.1.The epistemic defence of temporal discounting -- 13.2.Parfit's defence of temporal discounting -- 13.3.A formal framework for temporal discounting -- 13.4.Constraints on discounting functions -- 13.5.Ahmed's objection to Parfit -- 13.6.Amending Ahmed's objection -- 13.7.Exploitability does not imply irrationality -- 13.7.1.Time Consistency and Unexploitability -- 13.7.2.Changing preferences and changing selves -- 13.7.3.Equal weightings -- 13.7.4.On the alleged badness of exploitability -- 13.8.Appendix: Proofs of Lemmas 13.4.1, 13.4.2, and 13.4.3 -- 14.The nearer the dearer -- 14.1.The Stoic Objection -- 14.2.Proximity considerations -- 14.3.Aneri's career -- 14.4.Fernando's pension -- 14.5.The Problem of Choosing for Changing Weights -- 15.I'll be glad I did it--so, I'll do it -- 15.1.What is Til be glad I did it'reasoning? -- 15.2.Two problems with the reasoning -- 15.3.Deborah's choice -- 15.4.Self-frustrating choices -- 16.The road ahead -- 16.1.The Aggregate Utility Solution summarized -- 16.2.Questions for future selves -- 16.2.1.Sensitivity to risk -- 16.2.2.Imprecise credences and imprecise utilities.
- Summary
- What we value, like, endorse, want, and prefer changes over the course of our lives. Richard Pettigrew presents a theory of rational decision making for agents who recognise that their values will change over time and whose decisions will affect those future times.
- Subject(s)
- ISBN
- 9780191852800 (ebook)
- Audience Notes
- Specialized.
- Note
- This edition previously issued in print: 2019.
- Bibliography Note
- Includes bibliographical references and index.
View MARC record | catkey: 29992294