Actions for What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision

Email RIS file
Bookmark
Report an Issue

What Roe v. Wade should have said : the nation's top legal experts rewrite America's most controversial decision / edited with an introduction by Jack M. Balkin

Additional Titles
What Roe versus Wade should have said
Published
New York : New York University Press, [2005]
Copyright Date
©2005
Physical Description
xiii, 288 pages : illustrations ; 23 cm
Additional Creators
Balkin, J. M.

Availability

Browse Nearby on Shelf
I Want It
I Want It

Finding items...

Contents
Introduction. Roe v. Wade: an engine of controversy / Jack M. Balkin -- Revised opinions in Roe v. Wade and Doe v. Bolton. Jack M. Balkin (judgment of the Court) -- Reva Siegel (concurring) -- Mark Tushnet (concurring) -- Anita Allen (concurring in the judgment) -- Jed Rubenfeld (concurring in the judgment except as to Doe) -- Robin West (concurring in the judgment) -- Cass Sunstein (concurring in the judgment) -- Akhil Amar (concurring in Roe, dissenting in Doe) -- Jeffrey Rosen (dissenting) -- Teresa Stanton Collett (dissenting) --Michael Stokes Paulsen (dissenting) -- Photo appendix to the opinion of Michael Stokes Paulsen -- Comments from the contributors -- Appendix: The Constitution of the United States of America : selected provisions.
Subject(s)
ISBN
0814799183 (cloth : alk. paper)
Note
Includes index.
Bibliography Note
Bibliography: pages 267-273.
View MARC record | catkey: 3099090