Two mortgages taken out against the same slave where foreclosed on the same date. The slave was sold for [dollars] 890. Rule against the sheriff in the court below to pay over the proceeds of the sale. The Supreme Court was asked to rule which of the two had claim on the money arising from the sale of the slave. Jeptha George had given Kerrs and Hope notice of the prior mortgage to Neal. Kerrs and Hope had also been given other property besides the slave, Nelson, as security. Was the fact that Kerrs and Hope had foreclosed slightly earlier in the day material? It was held that the junior mortgagee, with notice of the prior lien, gained no preference by having his mortgage recorded. Lumpkin ruled that the court will take notice of all the equities which should bind the consciences of the applicants for the fund, and order it to be paid out accordingly.