Email RIS file
Bookmark
Report an Issue

Merger decisions and the rules of procedure of the European Community Courts / George Cumming

Author
Cumming, George (Lawyer)
Published
Alphen aan den Rijn, The Netherlands : Kluwer Law International, [2012]
Frederick, Md. : Sold and distributed in North, Central, and South America by Aspen Publishers.
Copyright Date
©2012
Physical Description
xvi, 438 pages ; 25 cm.

Availability

Browse Nearby on Shelf
I Want It
I Want It

Finding items...

Series
Contents
Machine generated contents note: ch. 1 Summary of Objectives of the Analysis -- 1.Summary of Objectives of the Analysis -- 2.Principles to be used in this Analysis -- 2.1.Article 6(1) ECHR: The Absolute Right to Due Process and the Derived Right of Access to a Court -- 3.Rectitude of Decision -- 3.1.Effective Judicial Protection -- 4.Judicial Control of the Express and the Derived Rights of Article 6(1) ECHR -- 4.1.Conformity with ECHR Article 6.1 -- 4.2.The Derived Right of Access to a Court Pursuant to Article 6(1) -- 4.3.Procedural Restrictions on Article 340(2) TFEU and Compliance with Article 6(1) ECHR, Rectitude of Decision and Effective Judicial Protection -- 4.3.1.Substantive Scope of Article 340(2) TFEU -- 4.3.2.The Nature of the procedurally based restrictions on Article 340(2) TFEU -- 4.4.The Merger Control Regulation and Article 6(1) ECHR -- 4.5.Article 6(1) ECHR and the Commission Procedure -- 4.6.Difficulties Caused by the Rules of Procedure of the GC and the ECJ -- 5.Theoretical Context of the Analysis -- 5.1.Absence of an Active Duty to Ensure Case Management -- 6.Automec: Admissibility of the Claim Damages -- 7.The Obligation to Manage Cases Actively -- 8.Court Experts and Expert Opinion -- 9.Conclusion of the Introduction -- ch. 2 Civil Procedure Rules of the ECJ and the GC -- 1.Introduction -- 2.Rules of Civil Procedure -- 2.1.Basic Elements of the Rules of Pleading -- 2.2.Analysis of the ECJ and GC Rules of Pleading -- 2.3.Case Law Dealing with Pleadings in the ECJ and GC -- 3.Principles of Procedure -- 4.Contrast with the CPR and the CAT Rules of Procedure -- 4.1.CAT Rules of Pleading -- 5.Consequences of the Use of Imprecise Rules of Pleading on Internal Rules -- 6.Breach of Article 6(1) ECHR, of Rectitude of Decision and Effective Judicial Protection -- 6.1.Summary of the Non-compliance -- 6.2.Violation of the Article 6(1) ECHR -- 6.3.Violation of the Principle of Effective Judicial Protection -- 6.4.Violation of the Principle of Rectitude of Decision -- 7.Additional Problems: Problems with Lack of Enforcement Powers -- ch. 3 Lack of Obligation for Active Case Management -- 1.Infringement by the Rules of the GC and the ECJ -- 1.1.Definition of Case Management -- 2.Case Management in the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) -- 3.Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) Rules -- 4.The First Case Management Conference: Planning the Case -- 4.1.Part of a Process of Active Case Management -- 4.2.Rules of Case Management in the GC -- 4.3.Analysis of the Rules of Civil Procedure and their Violations -- 4.4.Rectitude of Decision -- 4.4.1.Analysis of Cases -- 4.4.1.1.Rules of Procedure: Measures of Inquiry -- 4.4.2.Cases Relevant to Dismissal -- ch. 4 Analysis of Cases -- 1.Introduction: Expert Evidence -- 2.The Rules of procedure dealing with Expert Evidence -- 2.1.Rules of the ECJ -- 2.2.Considerations of Expert Evidence in English Law -- 3.Expert Opinion: The Substantive Scope Therefore -- 3.1.Scope of Expert Evidence as Regards the ECJ and GC -- 3.2.Purpose or Reason for the Use of Expert Evidence -- 3.3.Conclusion as to Scope of Evidence in EU Law -- 4.Consequences of the Restrictions upon the Appointment of an Expert -- 4.1.Initial Restrictions -- 4.2.Alternative Classification of the Restrictions -- 4.3.Costs and the Use of Expert Evidence -- 5.The Breach of Article 6(1) ECHR -- 5.1.The Restriction Based upon the Strength of the Substantive Case -- 5.2.Analysis of Additional Restrictions upon the Commissioning of an Expert's Report -- ch. 5 Conclusion -- 1.Overview of the Salient Points -- 1.1.Comparative Law and the Procedural Deficits of the ECJ and the GC -- 1.2.Need for Active Case Management, Clearer Rules of Pleading Particulars of Fact and Wider Discretion to Commission Experts Reports -- 1.3.Separation of the Adjudicative and the Investigatory Roles.
Summary
Of objectives of the analysis -- Civil procedure rules of the ECJ and the GC -- Lack of obligation for active case management -- Analysis of cases -- Conclusion.
Subject(s)
ISBN
9789041136718 (hbk. : alk. paper)
9041136711 (hbk. : alk. paper)
Bibliography Note
Includes bibliographical references (pages [419]-424) and index.
View MARC record | catkey: 8166316